solar energy vs fossil fuels

Solar Energy vs Fossil Fuels: Costs, Stats, Present & Future

ByEditorial Staff

Fossil fuels have been the chief energy source for human civilization since the beginning of time, from wood to coal, petroleum, natural gas, etc., the world has largely been run by fossil energy. However, with concerns about global warming and the depleting nature of this resource, focus has shifted to harnessing renewable and eco-friendly(or green) energy sources. Among renewable sources–wind and solar energy account for the highest share in the world energy mix, almost 40% (as of 2024)

In this article, we will be diving into an in-depth comparison between solar energy (generated through the means of Solar Photovoltaic Panels) vs. Fossil Fuels.

Table of Contents

 

Solar Energy vs Fossil Fuels: Comprehensively Compared 

 

 

 

 

 1.  Efficiency of Solar Vs Fossil Fuels 

To speak on the efficiency of solar energy and fossil fuels, we must first understand what should be considered “efficient”. The comparison of useful energy output to the total input is called Energy efficiency. It is the energy that gets released when they go through combustion or how much of it transforms to electricity/power for something, in the case of fossil fuels. In the case of solar panels, this tells you how much sunlight is turned into electricity.

– Solar Panel Efficiency:

  • Current SMD(Surface-mounted) solar panels can convert 15-22% of absorbed sunlight into electricity. Technological improvements such as monocrystalline and thin-film solar panels are still serving to raise output efficiency to lab-level paneling, to approximately 24-25%

– Fossil Fuel Efficiency:

  • Fossil fuels enjoy an edge when it comes to energy efficiency (especially coal and natural gas) they have an energy conversion efficiency of 33-40% (for coal-power plants). For some high-end range, modern combined-cycle gas generation the efficiency may go up to 60% . However, extracting fossil fuels from the ground and transporting them to combustion facilities results in energy losses; additionally, resulting emissions should also be considered.

 

 2. availability 

  • Solar energy, unlike fossil fuels, can be free of fuel extraction or transportation costs.
  • The conversion technology of solar energy is improving day by day, resulting in higher efficiency variants coming out in the market.
  • While fossil fuels have a higher energy density, they are finite and result in substantial greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Solar energy is an abundant, practically never-endy resource. Fossil fuels have a fast-approacing expiry date. 

 

3. Solar Energy VS Fossil Fuels –  Statistics

The infographic below represents a snapshot of the comparison between solar energy and fossil fuels.

– Energy Efficiency:

  • Solar Panels; 15-22% (with lab-tested efficiency of up to about 24%)
  • Fossil Fuels: 33-40%(gas-fired plants up to 60% for modern-day plants)

Global Energy Contribution (2024)

  • Solar Energy- 3.3% of the global electricity generation
  • Fossil Fuels: More than 80 percent of the energy supply for global use, coal accounts for 36.7%, natural gas is responsible for delivering an estimated figure reaching up to 23.4% and, lastly oil at about 31%.
  • Solar is the leading renewable energy investment, accounting for 59% of the total.

– Carbon Emissions:

  • More than 75% of global greenhouse gas emissions come from fossil fuels
  • Solar Energy-, No emissions are produced during operation and marginal emissions often come from manufacture.

 Levelized Cost of Energy:

The Levelized Coat of Energy reflects the average cost in currency(here, USD) per energy unit(expressed as–$ per unit(MWh). 

  • Solar energy: $20-40 per MWh (at utility scale and reflecting typical regional variation)
  • Coal: $65-$150 per MWh
  • Natural Gas: $45-70 per MWh

 

 

4.  Solar Energy vs Fossil Fuels- Pros and Cons

Solar Energy:
Pros

Cons

  1. Environmentally friendly- a green source of energy
  1. Weather-dependent, as they produce energy only during daylight hours
  1. Low-operational costs

       2. Higher installation and up-front costs

  1. Encourage energy independence(are not affected by energy or oil crises/imports), and a renewable source of energy

       3. Less efficient than Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels:

Pros

Cons

  1. Easily available and accessible
  1. Degrades the environment; contributes to global warming
  1. Low initial costs

      2. Higher operational and long-term costs

  1. A reliable and efficient source of energy

      3. A depleting source of energy, it is also affected by global oil and energy fluctuations.

 

 

 

5.  Fossil Fuels vs Solar Energy– Carbon Footprint

This is where these two sources differ the most significantly! The Carbon Emissions of both energy sources are significantly different and this is what highlights the difference in their positive/or negative impact on the environment and the planet in general!

  • The carbon footprint of Fossil Fuels

When we burn fossil fuels (coal, oil, and gas) to create energy for generating heat or electricity, a considerable amount of CO2 is released along with other greenhouse gases(Methane, Water Vapour, Nitrous Oxide, etc.)

  • Coal produces around 2.21 pounds of CO2 per kWh offset independently by energy generation and delivery
  • Natural Gas: At 1.21 pounds of CO2 per kWh, natural gas is cleaner than coal, but since it still causes the greenhouse effect we do not consider this a green energy source
  • Solar panel carbon impact:

Solar panels have an extremely low carbon footprint. Yes–there are emissions to be accounted for in material and solar-panel manufacturing, as well as transportation, but not at all during operation. Between 20–50g of CO2/kWh emission can be attributed to a solar panel over its entire lifespan.

 

 

6.  Fossil vs. Solar- Costs

We will consider both the upfront and Long-Term costs when comparing the associated costs of Fossil Fuels vs. Solar Energy.

– Upfront Costs:

  • Solar Panels – Although installation costs widely fluctuate for solar panels, an average residential system is within the range of $10,000 and could go up to $30k+ (based on the size of the project & location) But in many countries, tax incentives and rebates as well as finance offerings help to bring initial costs down. For instance, the US Government offers a Federal Tax Credit of 30% for solar installations.
  • Fossil Fuels: Fossil fuel power plants have cheaper initial set-up costs but high recurring costs, depending on the market price of fuels. The upfront cost of petrol cars is initially cheaper than electric vehicles. However, as far as running costs go, over time it becomes more expensive to run a car on fuel vs. electricity

– Long-Term Costs:

  • Solar panels have minimal maintenance costs and no fuel and transportation costs(for fixed residential, commercial, or utility-scale projects). Manufacturers claim that over 20-30 years, savings on energy bills can amount to tens of thousands of dollars for owners.
  • Fossil fuel systems on the other hand, entail a continuous fluctuation of prices and a long line of long-term expenses, as their productivity also dwindles in colder-than-usual seasons, they are affected by oil crises or political disturbances in the world’s major Oil producing(OPEC) Nations. In addition to higher long-term costs, the energy source is also finite and rapidly dwindling.

–

 

 

7.  Solar vs Petrol- Present Adoption  

The transportation sector accounts for a large portion of global fuel consumption and gas guzzlers are losing ground as electric vehicles (EVs) gain popularity, which will lead to vast reductions in fossil fuels. Solar energy is creeping up on petrol’s dominant position.

Global Adoption of Solar Energy (2023):

Global solar installations have been multiplying manifold in the last few years and the year 2023 saw around 450 GW of direct-current solar installations worldwide, which added to the total installations, bringing them to 1.6 TWdc. China leads the race in solar capacity, being much ahead of the other leading contributors which include the USA, India, etc.,

– Petrol Consumption (2022):

Although renewables have continued to grow, fossil fuels — such as gasoline — still contributed 31% of the global energy consumption in 2022 and has only moved on to increase by another 2.4% in 2023.

  • EV vs Petrol Vehicle Adoption:-

-The global EV quota had risen to 10 million by the year 2022, and is expected to rise at a CAGR of 18.2% from some estimated values till then — published figures indicate this rate will hold until almost the end of further years. Every year, increasingly EVs are bought over conventional fuel-run cars, and in 2023 almost 1 in 5 cars bought globally was an EV.

With the latest innovations in the Electric Vehicle industry and the drive towards sustainability, the worldwide customer base for EVs is growing, countries such as Norway have accomplished more than 60 percent of EV market adoption, making them less reliant on gas-powered cars.

 

 

8. Solar Energy Vs Fossil Fuels – Future

In the foreseeable future, will solar energy rise towards becoming one of our primary energy sources? With the commitment of nations towards decreasing their carbon footprint(as per the Net Zero target of the UN Sustainable Development Goals adopted worldwide, the member-states are committed to cutting carbon emissions by 45-50% by 2030 and achieving a Net-Zero target by 2050. In line with these goals cleaner energy solutions are bound to rise and, solar power as one of the leading renewable sources out there, is growing very rapidly. 

– Solar Power Growth Rate:

The International Energy Agency (IEA) ranks solar as one of the most renewable sources of energy, next only to hydropower. In the recent decade, it has also grown immensely in popularity and recent data shows that it accounted for 5.5% of global electricity. The US Department of Energy-Solar Energies Technology Offices aims to completely decarbonize the energy sector by 2035, and solar is sure to play a major part in it.

– Fossil Fuel Decline:

 Within a few decades, it is projected that the use of oil could decrease considerably, and, coal consumption will plummet for sure. According to recent projections, oil demand will reach to a maximum point by 2030 and then decline as the popularity of electric vehicles and cleaner energy options rise.

Breakthroughs in Solar Technology

Advancements in solar panel efficiency, i.e., perovskite solar cells(low cost of production and high efficiency) and bifacial solar panels are likely to accelerate the pace of solar adoption by enhancing energy conversion efficiencies along with cost savings.

 

Final Thoughts

A comparison between Fossil Fuels and Solar energy as energy sources across different criteria like costs, adoption rates supply, adoption rates, etc., yields a clear picture of both the advantages as well as drawbacks of both. However, the conclusion lies in the fact that Solar Energy is a renewable and green source of energy, while solar energy are not. While the present may still be fossil-based, the future is clearly solar.

  • Greater-utilization of solar energy as compared to fossil fuels and 59% of the total new investments being cornered by solar manifests an important bellwether within the global energy market. Although fossil fuels have powered industrial advancement for more than 100 years the price of their environmental and economic toll becomes harder to stomach each year. Solar Power, on the other hand, is a clean, renewable, and affordable alternative that has taken over most parts of the World, and perhaps reflects a glimpse into our clean, green, and energy-abundant future.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Similar Posts